Which statement about supervision of registered applicators when applying restricted-use pesticides is correct?

• A. Registered applicators are not required to be supervised when applying restricted-use pesticides.
• B. Registered applicators must be directly supervised by a certified applicator when applying restricted-use pesticides.
• C. Registered applicators must be supervised only for general-use pesticides.
• D. Registered applicators must be supervised by a supervisor for all pesticide applications.

Answer: (B)

Direct supervision by a certified applicator is required when applying restricted-use pesticides. The certified supervisor must be on-site and able to take over control if needed, ensuring the on-the-spot oversight necessary to follow label directions, use required PPE, and manage any safety concerns. This setup protects people, pets, and the environment by keeping an experienced applicator actively guiding the work.

The idea that no supervision is needed ignores the safety and regulatory protections in place for restricted-use products. Saying supervision is only for general-use pesticides is incorrect because the requirement specifically addresses restricted-use pesticides. Saying supervision is required for all pesticide applications is too broad; the emphasis here is on restricted-use pesticides, which demand direct supervision.